Executive & operational cyber-risk visibility
Raptor Board
See risk clearly โ one role-based view of cyber, privacy and compliance posture, from board summary down to engineering detail.
The problem
What it addresses
- Cyber data is scattered across scanners, cloud platforms, ticketing systems, spreadsheets and GRC tools.
- Executives need concise risk visibility while engineers need actionable detail โ from the same source.
- Teams burn time hand-producing reports that go stale almost immediately.
Capabilities
What it does
- Visualization and reporting for cyber, privacy and risk information.
- Aggregation of risks, threats, vulnerabilities, control status and compliance data.
- Role-based views โ executive / CTO / CISO summaries through to product- and engineering-level detail.
- Portfolio, product, asset and trend views showing movement over time.
- Integration model that consumes APIs, DevOps tools and other enterprise sources.
Differentiators
Why it's different
- One management layer across disciplines, not another isolated scanner dashboard.
- Business posture for leaders, drill-down detail for engineers.
- Combines Raptor-native data with external sources for a broader risk picture.
- Emphasises trends and decision support over raw vulnerability counts.
In practice
A CISO views portfolio-level risk and control maturity, while an engineering manager drills into one product to see open threats, vulnerabilities, control gaps and remediation โ all from one place.
Where it fits
Part of one connected lifecycle
ClassifyControlDesignComplyGovern
Risk context created upstream is reused here, instead of being rebuilt independently by GRC, AppSec and engineering.
Explore next
Related products
See Raptor Board on your own estate
We'll walk through how Raptor Board fits your risk profile, frameworks and existing tooling.
Get Assessment โ โน All products